Post by MIRIAM JACOB on Mar 27, 2007 0:38:42 GMT -5
THE REPUBLIC OF GLORY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
HOLDEN AT THE WHITE THRONE, THIS LAST DAY OF END TIME
RETRIAL OF CASE NO. 001/ OF THE FALL OF MAN.
THE DEVIL................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
MANKIND................. ACCUSED
Headnote{ REDEMPTION IN LIEU OF THE CROSS}
Judgment by LORD GOD OF GLORY
This is an application by the human race,
for retrial of a case arising from Judgment,
passed under the LAW by which every man
was deemed separated from God,
and destined for eternal separation.
At the time of the this application,
the previous Judgment was not yet executed,
and the prosecution feels that the judge
should be "functus officio",
or hand tied in reversing the first judgment,
since it was the same judge who passed the judgment,
and his jurisdiction had elapsed.
But on grounds of the great
and fundamental divine imperative,
we have decided that the case be heard
on its own merit not based on technicalities,
hence this revision.
For the avoidance of doubt,
it is incumbent upon me to state that
matters arising under the old legal order
be deemed overtaken by the new Grace order
that came into force on Resurrection day.
This will have the benefit of giving both counsel
guidance on how to lead their cases.
I should also aver that as a cardinal principle
of Biblical interpretation, where the meaning of
any provisions of the verses is not clear,
resort should be had to the intention of the
maker of the instrument. In this case the
"Council of the Trinity".
As you will all realize, it is not by sheer coincidence
that one of those who enacted the the Bible
happened to be the defense counsel,
The Hon. His Lordship JESUS CHRIST,
Saviour of the World and Author
Of all Knowledge and Wisdom.
Seen from His profile, He is so learned
and widely read, especially in the area of GRACE
where He carried out a detailed research
as part of His thesis for a PH.D
(PASSION for HUMAN DELIVERANCE).
Therefore, as an academic stalwart, teacher,
counselor, author and advocate, we shall give
special and vast consideration to His inference
of grace and his opinion will be binding on this court.
His authority, power and influence in our kingdom
go without saying as everyone is aware that
God the Father conferred His power upon Him
when He raised Him from the dead.
He seated Him in the heavenly places
at the right hand of God the Father,
subjecting everything under his feet
to the glory of the Father ,
and he gave it to the church.(Eph. 1:19-22).
Who then can condemn but Christ Jesus
who died, was raised to life and is at the right
hand of God and is interceding for us? ( Rom 8:34).
All this is for proper direction of the course
of our proceedings well knowing that
this session was long due and is the
first acid test for our new legal paradigm, "The grace".
In which case we shall seek the guidance, counsel,
prerogative and indulgence of the only wise God,
for His glory's sake through Christ Jesus. (Rom. 16;27)
For purposes of future proceedings,
this case shall be the only "locus classicas"
setting the precedent.
Its"ratio decidendi" ( reason for the decision)
shall not be altered by any subsequent rulings,
whether passed by this court or otherwise
and shall be taken to be the only yardstick
for all cases arising in future to all eternity.
In pursuance of justice, which is the foundation
of this throne( Ps 97), i would like to address a
matter raised by the prosecutor ( the vicious Devil)
that the judge should be "functus officio"
i.e. barred from presiding over this case
as was requested by the defence.
His reasons being that the Judgment
was passed under the "Law".
However, the imperative here is that our kingdom
thrives on the culture of "whoever believes"
introduced in the era of salvation which excludes
no one who believes. (John.1:12 - "as many as have believed in Him,
to them he gave the right to become children of God).
Analyzing the Law word by word, any scholar
of the Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth (Bible)
will attest to the fact that the same was an ad hoc
arrangement and a precursor for Grace. (Gal. 3:24,
so the Law was put in charge to lead them to Christ
that they may be justified by faith).
Now if it was an ad hoc arrangement,
then its authority and leverage no longer hold,
but grace through faith in Jesus Christ, hence no one
is any longer under the supervision of the Law. (Gal. 3:25)
In answer to the objection raised by the prosecutor therefore,
I will dis-hesitantly overrule the same as being of no effect.
Stating that what is left for me
is to delve into the crux of the case,
and I do hereby address my mind to its peculiarity.
END OF PART ONE
SEQUEL FOLLOWS
(C) JUSTINE
All Rights Reserved.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
HOLDEN AT THE WHITE THRONE, THIS LAST DAY OF END TIME
RETRIAL OF CASE NO. 001/ OF THE FALL OF MAN.
THE DEVIL................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
MANKIND................. ACCUSED
Headnote{ REDEMPTION IN LIEU OF THE CROSS}
Judgment by LORD GOD OF GLORY
This is an application by the human race,
for retrial of a case arising from Judgment,
passed under the LAW by which every man
was deemed separated from God,
and destined for eternal separation.
At the time of the this application,
the previous Judgment was not yet executed,
and the prosecution feels that the judge
should be "functus officio",
or hand tied in reversing the first judgment,
since it was the same judge who passed the judgment,
and his jurisdiction had elapsed.
But on grounds of the great
and fundamental divine imperative,
we have decided that the case be heard
on its own merit not based on technicalities,
hence this revision.
For the avoidance of doubt,
it is incumbent upon me to state that
matters arising under the old legal order
be deemed overtaken by the new Grace order
that came into force on Resurrection day.
This will have the benefit of giving both counsel
guidance on how to lead their cases.
I should also aver that as a cardinal principle
of Biblical interpretation, where the meaning of
any provisions of the verses is not clear,
resort should be had to the intention of the
maker of the instrument. In this case the
"Council of the Trinity".
As you will all realize, it is not by sheer coincidence
that one of those who enacted the the Bible
happened to be the defense counsel,
The Hon. His Lordship JESUS CHRIST,
Saviour of the World and Author
Of all Knowledge and Wisdom.
Seen from His profile, He is so learned
and widely read, especially in the area of GRACE
where He carried out a detailed research
as part of His thesis for a PH.D
(PASSION for HUMAN DELIVERANCE).
Therefore, as an academic stalwart, teacher,
counselor, author and advocate, we shall give
special and vast consideration to His inference
of grace and his opinion will be binding on this court.
His authority, power and influence in our kingdom
go without saying as everyone is aware that
God the Father conferred His power upon Him
when He raised Him from the dead.
He seated Him in the heavenly places
at the right hand of God the Father,
subjecting everything under his feet
to the glory of the Father ,
and he gave it to the church.(Eph. 1:19-22).
Who then can condemn but Christ Jesus
who died, was raised to life and is at the right
hand of God and is interceding for us? ( Rom 8:34).
All this is for proper direction of the course
of our proceedings well knowing that
this session was long due and is the
first acid test for our new legal paradigm, "The grace".
In which case we shall seek the guidance, counsel,
prerogative and indulgence of the only wise God,
for His glory's sake through Christ Jesus. (Rom. 16;27)
For purposes of future proceedings,
this case shall be the only "locus classicas"
setting the precedent.
Its"ratio decidendi" ( reason for the decision)
shall not be altered by any subsequent rulings,
whether passed by this court or otherwise
and shall be taken to be the only yardstick
for all cases arising in future to all eternity.
In pursuance of justice, which is the foundation
of this throne( Ps 97), i would like to address a
matter raised by the prosecutor ( the vicious Devil)
that the judge should be "functus officio"
i.e. barred from presiding over this case
as was requested by the defence.
His reasons being that the Judgment
was passed under the "Law".
However, the imperative here is that our kingdom
thrives on the culture of "whoever believes"
introduced in the era of salvation which excludes
no one who believes. (John.1:12 - "as many as have believed in Him,
to them he gave the right to become children of God).
Analyzing the Law word by word, any scholar
of the Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth (Bible)
will attest to the fact that the same was an ad hoc
arrangement and a precursor for Grace. (Gal. 3:24,
so the Law was put in charge to lead them to Christ
that they may be justified by faith).
Now if it was an ad hoc arrangement,
then its authority and leverage no longer hold,
but grace through faith in Jesus Christ, hence no one
is any longer under the supervision of the Law. (Gal. 3:25)
In answer to the objection raised by the prosecutor therefore,
I will dis-hesitantly overrule the same as being of no effect.
Stating that what is left for me
is to delve into the crux of the case,
and I do hereby address my mind to its peculiarity.
END OF PART ONE
SEQUEL FOLLOWS
(C) JUSTINE
All Rights Reserved.