Post by MIRIAM JACOB on Mar 27, 2007 0:54:05 GMT -5
FINAL JUDGMENT
I have had the privilege to listen to the engendering
submissions of the two counsel who are divided so
variably on the fate of the accused each asking this
court to grant their prayer that comes with either a
conviction or acquittal.
And being a case of a very special kind brought after a change in the
legal regime which I must state offered a great impediment
to easy navigability of the case, yet I have to give
my verdict now..
The offence alleged has the following elements
1. Existence of the law
2. Overt or covert act of sin by man
3. Lack of repentance
4. Failure to ask for of forgiveness from Jesus Christ
For the prosecutor to secure a conviction of an
accused sinner, he MUST prove all the four elements
taking into consideration my prerogative of mercy.
After an elaborate and exhaustive process, we had the
benefit of an insightful discourse provided by the
defence counsel who by his able and microscopic
understanding of both the old and new legal orders
metamophosing in the crescendo of Grace, showed that
grace succeeded the law and did over take the former.
Looking at each argument categorically, I will state
that the position before CLR (Calvary Lamb's Revolution)
was as stated by the prosecutor. And if this case had come before
CLR, I would be too inclined to give a second thought but to yield to
the prosecutions persuasions.
Man would be condemned and sentence meted out in full.
The alleged event happened slightly after creation meaning
that whatever transpired can not be accurately traced from
any recent memory except by looking at the documented
account in the "grund norm", i.e. the Bible.
It contains the gist of every concept we are dealing with
here. I should state that both counsel showed
themselves skilled in their art of advocacy.
The devil spelling out the law and The Hon, His
Lordship Jesus, maintaining that grace is the way to go.
It is very true that at one time my authority in the
garden of Eden was challenged and rightly so. What i
entrusted with man who is the accused in this case was
robbed with impunity. I still maintain that to bring
the accused into this dilemma, was stage managed so
as to challenge my nature of Justice and Love.
Justice,because I am the Lord God who punishes every
wrong doing seen from Psalm 1:5-6."... the wicked will
not stand in judgment nor the sinners in the
congregation of the righteous but the way of the
wicked will perish".
By mentioning the word disobedience, the prosecutor
was appealing to for the whims of vindictiveness.
And Love, because I am the summation of love and the
fullness there of, always known as the God of love,
forgiving sins and removing all transgressions,
raising the poor from the ash heap and seating them
with kings. That is my nature.(Psalm 113).
These are the truecornerstone of my throne.
What was i to do in the face of man's fall? I had to allow both facades
of my nature and rule to take effect; do Justice by
punishment and show love by redemption.
So I banished man temporarily and provided him with
the blood of animals as a means of getting access to
me. This remedy was so ineffective and it nagged my
feelings as I kept waiting for an appropriate time to
make a worthy sacrifice to ransom mankind.
These facts are missing from the prosecution case. All
that he ably stated was there being judgment and
judgment based on the Law. Let no one forget that
there was a Calvary revolution which we referred to as
Calvary Lamb's Revolution that overturned the law.
But if i may take leave to remember the event, man
sinned because he was duped into believing a lie, and
for that matter if man is to be condemned , the
accomplice who deceived him will have to receive a
heavier sentence.I am aware the same accomplice is the
prosecutor himself, Mr devil. What kind of debased
bravery this is!
When man fell, his fall evoked my compassion.
The former system demonstrates the nature of the old
legal status quo, but the latter is what I will refer
to, having been ably elucidated by the defence
counsel, The Hon. His Lordship Jesus Christ in his
plea.
Man became an object of my mercy and grace, yet I
couldn't forget the justice that needed to be done. To
acquiesce to no punishment for sin would mean denying
my nature of justice.
This prompted the most complex phenomenon of all times to get the
equation right.
To say the least, it was TID ( Triumph In Death) and both
my attributes were satisfied, man received forgiveness
and sin was punished, briefly known as DDT ( DIVINE
DOUBLE THERAPY) as was exhaustively submitted on by
the defence.
Weighing the two sides, I am moved by my forgiving
instinct to grant mercy, Micah 7:18 - ("Who is God like
you pardoning inequity and passing over
transgression... he does not retain his anger forever
because he delights in steadfast love. he will again
have compassion on us, he will tread our inequity
under his foot and cast our sins in the sea of
forgetfulness").
My Judgment, all ye nation, will come in no less a
word than this, that the "sine qua non" for the accused
to approach this throne has been complied with in John
19:30 when the defence said it was finished.
The same was referred to in another provision in Col 2:13-15 in
that those who were dead in sin and the uncircumcision
of the flesh , God made alive together with him having
forgiven all trespasses by canceling the records that
stood against the people with legal demands. This he
set aside by nailing it to the cross. He disarmed the
rulers and authorities and put them to open shame
triumphing over them in him.
During the inspection of exhibits, the defence showed
to this court his hands, feet and side that were
pierced and the crown of disgrace that he wore for the
redemption of man. This corroborated the evidence in
Col 2:14 and leaves nothing to doubt.
But before I state my final verdict , I want to
ransack the records to unearth some of the failed
attempt by the same prosecutor to prove his case
substantially, when he tried to condemn , one Moses.
In that proceeding , the evidence of the prosecutor
was miserably wanting. And i decided that the cradle
of justice shouldn't be turned into a flood gate of
amateurish, devious and heartless malicous begrudging.
The records show that our Court orderly, Gen. Michael contended
with the prosecution in Jude 9 when he rebuked the
latter in my name. Subsequently, someone was mandated
to keep men from stumbling and to present them
blameless before the glorious presence of this
throne(Jude 24) and who would that be if not The Hon.
His Lordship Christ Jesus.
For these stated reasons, I am left with no choice but
to all heartedly and joyfully without reservation
applaud the defence counsel for having exhibited the
greatest aptitude in his career as Saviour of
mankind. For all the times he appeared before this
throne, my answer to him has always and still remains
YES and AMEN.
I can't find any memento of flaw in his
work of redemption and he has forever remained the
only infallible lamb of God. I can't help but to
declare mankind FREE FOR ALL ETERNITY, to the glory of
God the Father though Christ Jesus.
The previous judgment, conviction and sentence is
hereby overturned and this being the highest court in
all creation, no appeal lies from it, this day enforth
Passed under my hands and faithfulness, this Last day
of End Time.
Signed
LORD GOD OF GLORY
THE ONLY WISE AND TRUE JUDGE
(C) JUSTINE
All Rights Reserved.
I have had the privilege to listen to the engendering
submissions of the two counsel who are divided so
variably on the fate of the accused each asking this
court to grant their prayer that comes with either a
conviction or acquittal.
And being a case of a very special kind brought after a change in the
legal regime which I must state offered a great impediment
to easy navigability of the case, yet I have to give
my verdict now..
The offence alleged has the following elements
1. Existence of the law
2. Overt or covert act of sin by man
3. Lack of repentance
4. Failure to ask for of forgiveness from Jesus Christ
For the prosecutor to secure a conviction of an
accused sinner, he MUST prove all the four elements
taking into consideration my prerogative of mercy.
After an elaborate and exhaustive process, we had the
benefit of an insightful discourse provided by the
defence counsel who by his able and microscopic
understanding of both the old and new legal orders
metamophosing in the crescendo of Grace, showed that
grace succeeded the law and did over take the former.
Looking at each argument categorically, I will state
that the position before CLR (Calvary Lamb's Revolution)
was as stated by the prosecutor. And if this case had come before
CLR, I would be too inclined to give a second thought but to yield to
the prosecutions persuasions.
Man would be condemned and sentence meted out in full.
The alleged event happened slightly after creation meaning
that whatever transpired can not be accurately traced from
any recent memory except by looking at the documented
account in the "grund norm", i.e. the Bible.
It contains the gist of every concept we are dealing with
here. I should state that both counsel showed
themselves skilled in their art of advocacy.
The devil spelling out the law and The Hon, His
Lordship Jesus, maintaining that grace is the way to go.
It is very true that at one time my authority in the
garden of Eden was challenged and rightly so. What i
entrusted with man who is the accused in this case was
robbed with impunity. I still maintain that to bring
the accused into this dilemma, was stage managed so
as to challenge my nature of Justice and Love.
Justice,because I am the Lord God who punishes every
wrong doing seen from Psalm 1:5-6."... the wicked will
not stand in judgment nor the sinners in the
congregation of the righteous but the way of the
wicked will perish".
By mentioning the word disobedience, the prosecutor
was appealing to for the whims of vindictiveness.
And Love, because I am the summation of love and the
fullness there of, always known as the God of love,
forgiving sins and removing all transgressions,
raising the poor from the ash heap and seating them
with kings. That is my nature.(Psalm 113).
These are the truecornerstone of my throne.
What was i to do in the face of man's fall? I had to allow both facades
of my nature and rule to take effect; do Justice by
punishment and show love by redemption.
So I banished man temporarily and provided him with
the blood of animals as a means of getting access to
me. This remedy was so ineffective and it nagged my
feelings as I kept waiting for an appropriate time to
make a worthy sacrifice to ransom mankind.
These facts are missing from the prosecution case. All
that he ably stated was there being judgment and
judgment based on the Law. Let no one forget that
there was a Calvary revolution which we referred to as
Calvary Lamb's Revolution that overturned the law.
But if i may take leave to remember the event, man
sinned because he was duped into believing a lie, and
for that matter if man is to be condemned , the
accomplice who deceived him will have to receive a
heavier sentence.I am aware the same accomplice is the
prosecutor himself, Mr devil. What kind of debased
bravery this is!
When man fell, his fall evoked my compassion.
The former system demonstrates the nature of the old
legal status quo, but the latter is what I will refer
to, having been ably elucidated by the defence
counsel, The Hon. His Lordship Jesus Christ in his
plea.
Man became an object of my mercy and grace, yet I
couldn't forget the justice that needed to be done. To
acquiesce to no punishment for sin would mean denying
my nature of justice.
This prompted the most complex phenomenon of all times to get the
equation right.
To say the least, it was TID ( Triumph In Death) and both
my attributes were satisfied, man received forgiveness
and sin was punished, briefly known as DDT ( DIVINE
DOUBLE THERAPY) as was exhaustively submitted on by
the defence.
Weighing the two sides, I am moved by my forgiving
instinct to grant mercy, Micah 7:18 - ("Who is God like
you pardoning inequity and passing over
transgression... he does not retain his anger forever
because he delights in steadfast love. he will again
have compassion on us, he will tread our inequity
under his foot and cast our sins in the sea of
forgetfulness").
My Judgment, all ye nation, will come in no less a
word than this, that the "sine qua non" for the accused
to approach this throne has been complied with in John
19:30 when the defence said it was finished.
The same was referred to in another provision in Col 2:13-15 in
that those who were dead in sin and the uncircumcision
of the flesh , God made alive together with him having
forgiven all trespasses by canceling the records that
stood against the people with legal demands. This he
set aside by nailing it to the cross. He disarmed the
rulers and authorities and put them to open shame
triumphing over them in him.
During the inspection of exhibits, the defence showed
to this court his hands, feet and side that were
pierced and the crown of disgrace that he wore for the
redemption of man. This corroborated the evidence in
Col 2:14 and leaves nothing to doubt.
But before I state my final verdict , I want to
ransack the records to unearth some of the failed
attempt by the same prosecutor to prove his case
substantially, when he tried to condemn , one Moses.
In that proceeding , the evidence of the prosecutor
was miserably wanting. And i decided that the cradle
of justice shouldn't be turned into a flood gate of
amateurish, devious and heartless malicous begrudging.
The records show that our Court orderly, Gen. Michael contended
with the prosecution in Jude 9 when he rebuked the
latter in my name. Subsequently, someone was mandated
to keep men from stumbling and to present them
blameless before the glorious presence of this
throne(Jude 24) and who would that be if not The Hon.
His Lordship Christ Jesus.
For these stated reasons, I am left with no choice but
to all heartedly and joyfully without reservation
applaud the defence counsel for having exhibited the
greatest aptitude in his career as Saviour of
mankind. For all the times he appeared before this
throne, my answer to him has always and still remains
YES and AMEN.
I can't find any memento of flaw in his
work of redemption and he has forever remained the
only infallible lamb of God. I can't help but to
declare mankind FREE FOR ALL ETERNITY, to the glory of
God the Father though Christ Jesus.
The previous judgment, conviction and sentence is
hereby overturned and this being the highest court in
all creation, no appeal lies from it, this day enforth
Passed under my hands and faithfulness, this Last day
of End Time.
Signed
LORD GOD OF GLORY
THE ONLY WISE AND TRUE JUDGE
(C) JUSTINE
All Rights Reserved.